This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用，详情可参考wps
。谷歌是该领域的重要参考
id: "move_left_arm_action",
But these moral understandings of defamation and false imprisonment are implausible, it seems to me, and cannot make sense of the law. Take them in turn. It is certainly morally intelligible for the law to narrowly draw the boundaries of negligence liability for communicative activity in order to refrain from unduly impinging on the free flow of information and expression. Thus it is intelligible for the law to restrict fault-based liability for communicatively injuring another’s reputation — whether under the aegis of defamation or negligence — to statements “of and concerning” the plaintiff, just as the law tightly draws the boundaries of fault-based liability for causing physical injury by communicative means.249。关于这个话题，WhatsApp Web 網頁版登入提供了深入分析